0408

You could argue:

(3) Where the witness was immediately prior to the robbery and her naming someone who can verify her presence helps the jury evaluate her credibility as a witness. We know that she was in the bank and what she could and could not have seen. The credibility of witnesses is always a relevant issue.

(4) How she felt will help prove that property was taken "by putting her in fear," which is an element of the crime of robbery (see the indictment in problem 4A).

Questions? E-mail tanford@indiana.edu and refer to 0408

Problem 4D, State v. Wayne. Make the argument that the evidence in part 1 (that the defendant previously used drugs) is relevant to whether he distributed drugs. When you have your argument ready, click here to continue.