Here's the objection I would make:

"I object to this exhibit. The note is irrelevant and not admissible under Rule 402. The fact that Smith and Jones wrote his name on a piece of paper has no tendency to help distinguish whether Harper was part of the conspiracy, or they just copied his name out of the phone book."

Did your objection have all three parts?

1) A clear statement of what evidence you object to.

2) The rule you are invoking.

3) A brief argument or explanation.

What response should the defense make to this objection? Write out your response, and then click here to continue.