[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]

1011

 

I would argue that the plaintiff has not laid the necessary foundation required by Rule 609. Convictions are admissible under 609(a)(1) only if they are felonies, and under 609(a)(2) only if they involved dishonesty, and the plaintiff has not established either one.

Questions? Email tanford@indiana.edu, and refer to 1011

Question 8 asks Matt is a drug user. What objection?  When you think you know the answer, click here.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]