1002

I can’t think of one. This looks relevant for a substantive reason -- establishing whether he had the opportunity to commit the act. You only need to rely on rules about impeachment when the only relevancy of evidence is that it casts doubt on the credibility of the witness's testimony.

Questions? Email tanford@indiana.edu, and refer to 1002.

What about the second question about members not scanning their cards when they leave? Any objection? When you have an answer, click here.