0804

I would object on Rule 403 grounds, not Rule 407.

"I object to evidence of the change in design on Rule 403 grounds. Because the litigation concerns the bulldozer, and the change was made to a loader, the evidence is of little or no probative value, and will simply confuse the issues."

Questions? E-mail tanford@indiana.edu and refer to 0804.

Assume that Caterpillar instead objects that the redesign of the loader should be excluded as a subsequent remedial measure under Rule 407. What response(s) could the plaintiff make. When you have decided, click here to continue.