Skip to:
November 15, 2007, 3:15 p.m.–6 p.m.Bringing together a multi-disciplinary group of national and international scholars and practitioners to discuss the various issues facing attorneys, mediators, and judges during family disputes, this public forum is presented to in connection with a round table working conference co-sponsored by the Indiana University School of Law—Bloomington and the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences.
The program is approved for 2.5 hours of CLE credit (30 minutes of ethics), at no charge, for attorneys. There is no need to register in advance for the public forum. Attorney registration for CLE credit will take place at the door. Attorneys should bring their attorney numbers.
| 3:15 - 3:30 |
Welcoming Comments
|
| 3:30 - 4:15 |
Robert Emery
Professor of Psychology, and "Divorce Mediation versus Adversary Settlement: The Current Status of Social Science Research" |
| 4:15 - 5:00 |
Andrew Schepard
Professor of Law, and "Kramer v. Kramer Revisited: Ethical and Practical Considerations for Lawyers and Judges in High Conflict Cases for Represented and Self Represented Parents" |
| 5:00 - 6:00 |
Judges Panel Discussion Views from the Bench: What Works, What Does Not Work, and What Else Should the Family Law and Psychology Community be Developing?
Moderator
|